Will Bolivian president Rodrigo Paz Pereira remain in power through the end of 2026?
Latest forecast
Generated Oct 27, 2026, 3:30 AM
Write-up
Bolivia: Presidential continuity through year-end 2026
Routine update
The outlook is essentially unchanged: Paz remains strongly favored to hold Bolivia’s presidency continuously through year-end, at about 91%, up just 0.1 percentage point. The update adds firmer evidence of usable financing rather than a new political turning point.
Executive Summary
The probability that Rodrigo Paz Pereira remains continuously President of Bolivia through the end of 2026 is 90.8%. YES requires him to retain the presidency without a qualifying interruption through 23:59 local time on December 31.
As of October 27, roughly 66 days remain. Paz has survived a severe earlier confrontation, institutions continue to implement important government decisions, and opposition groups have not demonstrated a unified campaign capable of removing him. These considerations outweigh—but do not eliminate—the dangers from economic hardship, renewed strikes and weak public support.
The principal political risk is that separate protests converge and trigger legislative or security-force defections. A legally effective interim presidential succession is a distinct risk: it would defeat YES even if Paz subsequently returned.
Key drivers
Demonstrated resilience and continuing institutional support
Paz survived the 53-day May–June confrontation demanding his resignation. Subsequent institutional behavior also favors continuity: on September 17, 100 of 158 legislators present supported extending emergency powers, and police were still enforcing government policy against teachers’ demonstrations on October 20. These actions show practical support for consequential decisions, not a guarantee of unconditional loyalty.
Opposition dissatisfaction has not become a unified removal campaign
The Central Obrera Boliviana, or COB, Bolivia’s main trade-union federation, declined to join the march organized by supporters of former president Evo Morales on October 15. The announced October 19 Cochabamba march was subsequently paused and reduced to a meeting. Coordination for a proposed November 6 national march remained unfinished in later reporting.
Teachers’ mobilization is more concrete: they held a nationwide 24-hour strike on October 23 and threatened indefinite action. Their immediate demands concerned education policy and the education minister, however, rather than a shared ultimatum for Paz’s departure. The crucial uncertainty is whether these sectoral grievances become a coordinated national challenge.
Economic pressure persists despite financial breathing room
The International Monetary Fund approved approximately US$1.9 billion over 36 months on October 2. Reporting citing the central bank confirmed that US$211.3 million arrived on October 6. That initial cash provides some protection against abrupt funding and supply failures; the full commitment is not immediately available.
The political effects run both ways. Financing supports government capacity, while fuel-subsidy adjustment and rising living costs sustain grievances. Paz also has little popularity to cushion another confrontation: Ipsos CIESMORI reported 21% approval and 61% disapproval. That survey covered 400 online respondents in four major cities, so it should not be treated as fully representative of Bolivia nationally.
Ordinary constitutional removal faces barriers
Recall cannot be requested before half the presidential mandate has elapsed. A trial for crimes committed in office requires prior authorization by two-thirds of legislators present. These constraints make a straightforward institutional removal less plausible within the remaining period than resignation following a wider political and security fracture.
The temporary-succession dispute remains consequential
Vice President Edmand Lara claimed to be acting president during Paz’s September foreign travel. The Executive rejected that claim and maintained that Paz continued governing remotely under Article 22 of Decree 5675. Paz chaired a virtual cabinet meeting, and Senate President Diego Ávila denied having assumed the presidency.
Some senior officials supported the competing succession interpretation, so this was a genuine legal dispute—not merely a rumor. Nevertheless, the evidence favors continued presidential authority rather than an established transfer. A contemporaneous legal review reported that the decree remained applicable pending judicial invalidation or suspension, but that was not a final court judgment.
The forecast therefore does not treat September as an established interruption. It also does not assume that current incumbency proves uninterrupted tenure.
Scenarios
The forecast places the greatest weight on continued but fragmented unrest. More disruptive paths receive less weight because they require coordination and institutional changes not yet demonstrated.
| Scenario | Relative weight and rationale | Route to the outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Fragmented or negotiable unrest | Dominant. Major organizations remain divided, some announced marches have stalled, and institutions continue carrying out government decisions. | Strikes and demonstrations continue, but negotiations, concessions and enforcement prevent presidential displacement. YES remains the expected outcome. |
| Sustained pressure across several sectors; institutions mostly hold | Secondary. Teachers’ strikes and overlapping economic grievances provide a plausible basis for broader mobilization. | Disruption intensifies, but Paz retains sufficient legislative and security backing. Survival remains more plausible, although resignation risk increases. |
| Acute national confrontation with institutional fracture | Lowest weight. It requires a coordinated escalation beyond the coalition visible at the cutoff. | Sustained disruption or further casualties broadens opposition; legislators or security forces withdraw support. Forced resignation or replacement becomes a credible NO outcome. |
Separate from these political trajectories, an actual constitutional transfer to an interim president would also produce NO. Death or incapacity remains a smaller residual route to interruption. These possibilities are included in the final forecast.
Implications
- Continuity is the appropriate central planning assumption, not political calm. Paz can remain president while strikes, transport disruption and policy disputes continue.
- Operational risk and leadership risk should be distinguished. Economic adjustment and blockades can impair activity without removing the government.
- Contingency planning should focus on combined failures. A broad protest coalition accompanied by legislative abandonment or security-force refusal would be more consequential than another resignation demand alone.
- The resolution rule matters. Even a short, legally effective interim succession could settle this question NO without a lasting change in political leadership.
Signs to watch
| Timing or development | What would matter | Direction for the forecast |
|---|---|---|
| October 27: announced teachers’ march | Whether mobilization expands into indefinite action and attracts other organized sectors, or instead moves toward an education agreement. | Sustained cross-sector participation makes YES less likely; a credible settlement makes it more likely. A verified indefinite coalition strike would warrant rerunning the forecast. |
| November 6: proposed national march toward La Paz | Actual turnout, participation by the COB and other organizations, and capacity to sustain disruption. The date remained tentative in later reporting. | A broad, durable mobilization makes YES less likely; another postponement or limited participation makes it more likely. Demonstrated national coordination would warrant a rerun. |
| November: announced foreign travel | Whether Paz continues governing remotely or a formal presidential substitution occurs. Exact itineraries and handover arrangements were not verified. | Recognized interim succession would settle NO. A binding ruling changing the travel arrangement would make YES less likely and warrant rerunning the forecast. |
| December: reported expiry of emergency powers | Whether restrictions end amid renewed blockades or without a resurgence of coordinated disruption. Retrieved accounts did not consistently establish the precise expiry date. | Renewed sustained disruption makes YES less likely; an orderly transition without escalation makes it more likely. |
| At any time: institutional defections | Refusal of security orders, senior-command defections, or a legislative coalition organized around replacement. | Each would make YES less likely. Verified security-force fracture would settle a major uncertainty and warrant an immediate rerun. |
| At any time: economic or legal announcements | Worsening fuel shortages or price pressure; alternatively, improved supplies and usable financing. Separately, an official record or judgment establishing a past presidential transfer. | Economic deterioration makes YES less likely; stabilization makes it more likely. A legally established qualifying past transfer would settle NO, regardless of Paz’s present incumbency. |
Research and methodology
The forecast combines a historical benchmark with current political evidence and a separate legal-continuity assessment.
- Official officeholder evidence: The Presidency’s October 26 announcement records Paz conducting presidential business. It supports current incumbency, not an independent assessment of stability.
- Institutional behavior: El País’s September 17 report documents emergency-power approval; AP’s October 20 report documents police action. Observable decisions received more weight than general declarations of loyalty.
- Protest coordination: La Razón on the COB’s position, Correo del Sur’s mobilization follow-up, and EFE’s teachers’ strike report distinguish announced campaigns from demonstrated action.
- Economic capacity and public opinion: The IMF program announcement, disbursement reporting, and Ipsos CIESMORI release inform the balance between government resources and public dissatisfaction.
- Legal continuity: The Constitution, official Decree 5675 text, and archived Bolivia Verifica legal review underpin the distinction between ordinary remote government and actual presidential substitution.
Original quantitative work assembled a presidential-departure chronology for 1982–2025 using sources including Rulers, Bolivia’s statistical institute and Latinobarómetro. A simple calculation translated the historical departure frequency into risk over the short remaining horizon. The forecast then adjusted that benchmark using the three political scenarios and separate continuity and personal-risk allowances. Those adjustments are judgments, not statistically fitted crisis probabilities.
Limitations
The most important missing information is a complete constitutional-court docket and authenticated presidential-transfer record. No binding ruling or transfer instrument establishing a qualifying September interruption was verified, but the research could not certify that none exists. A complete travel and succession register for the entire period was also unavailable.
Protest announcements do not establish turnout, financing or endurance, and public reporting cannot reveal private security-force loyalties. The historical departure sample is small and clustered, while the available approval poll has limited geographic and digital coverage. Accordingly, 90.8% should be read as the final judgment, not as evidence of equally precise underlying knowledge.
Forecast history
Hover a data point to trace its series, or click to view the forecast generated at that time.
Signed forecast receipt
Signed Oct 27, 2026, 3:30 AM with ed25519 key preseen-prod-ed25519-20260523 and externally timestamped Oct 27, 2026, 3:30 AM.
sha256:e28889737f1f13...0a568f807eWant forecasts like this?
Preseen researches your questions and answers them with calibrated, source-backed forecasts.